Parliament Website

Terminal 5 And Widening Of M25

EDM number 944 in 1995-96, proposed by Andrew Mackinlay on 04/06/1996.

That this House notes that the road traffic growth forecasts accompanying the new M25 widening scheme between junctions 12 and 15 make no allowance for the greatly expanded Heathrow envisaged in the Terminal 5 application; deplores the fiction being spread around that the proposed M25 widening and Terminal 5 schemes can be considered or treated separately; and reminds the Government that the linkage between the schemes was explicitly acknowledged in the House by the Secretary of State for Transport on 3rd April 1995.

This motion has been signed by a total of 10 MPs.

MPDateConstituencyPartyType
Andrew MacKinlay04/06/1996ThurrockProposed
Lynne Jones05/06/1996Birmingham, Selly OakSigned
Eddie Loyden05/06/1996Liverpool, GarstonSigned
Paul Flynn05/06/1996Newport WestSigned
Harry Barnes05/06/1996North East DerbyshireSigned
Ken Livingstone06/06/1996Brent EastSigned
Jack Thompson11/06/1996WansbeckSigned
Max Madden12/06/1996Bradford WestSigned
Alan Simpson24/06/1996Nottingham SouthSigned
Michael Connarty04/07/1996Falkirk EastSigned

Download raw data as csv or xml.